The tax department sought to bring the transaction of issue of share capital within the transfer pricing ambit. It held that the differential between the price at which shares were issued by Vodafone India and the valuation done by the tax department to be in the nature of a loan to the Mauritius-based parent company . In other words, equity was recharacterized as a loan. The tax department raised a demand of around Rs 3,200 crore.
However, the high court held that issue of shares does not give rise to any income and there can be no question of any transfer pricing adjustment. A bench of Chief Justice Mohit Shah and Justice M S Sanklecha ruled, "Issue of shares at a premium by the petitioner to its non-resident holding company does not give rise to any income from an admitted international transaction." For the purpose of application of transfer pricing provisions, one of the prerequisites is that there must be an international transaction between associated enterprises (Vodafone India and the Mauritius company in this case). However, in the absence of income, no international transaction can arise.
"There is no charge express or implied, in letter or in spirit to tax issue of shares at a premium as income. In this case, the revenue seems to be confusing the measure to a charge and calling the measure a notional income. We find that there is absence of any charge in the Act to subject issue of shares at a premium to tax," ob served the high court.
Vodafone said in a statement on Friday that the company "has maintained consistently throughout the legal proceedings that this transaction was not taxable. We welcome the decision today in the Bombay high court".
On August 21, 2008, Vodafone India had issued 2,89,224 equity shares of Rs 10 each at a premium of Rs 8,500 per share.
However, the transfer pricing officer revalued the shares at Rs 53,775 per share. Based on arm's length pricing adjustment, the tax department held a total shortfall of Rs 1,308.91 crore to be a deemed loan given by Vodafone India to its holding company. Periodical interest income was also held chargeable to tax in the hands of Vodafone India.
Sanjay Tolia, leader, transfer pricing at PwC India, said, "It is a welcome judgment as the transaction of issue of shares by Vodafone was nothing but a capital account transaction, and consequently the share premium, if any, ought to be capital receipt. The transfer pricing provisions permit the transaction to be re-quantified but not to be re-characterized. Hence, there was no question of the transaction resulting in 'income' taxable in India. The judgment will not only serve as a precedent in the legal arena but will also lend the much needed boost to foreign investors." Pranav Sayta, tax partner, EY India, said, "The verdict not only spells victory for Vodafone but also holds hope for other companies which are facing a similar dispute. One has to wait and see whether the tax department accepts this order or decides to appeal before the Supreme Court." Shell and two Essar Group companies are among several other MNCs contesting similar transfer pricing cases.
No comments:
Post a Comment